reading on feminism(s) and rroma women

“Re-envisioning Social Justice from the Ground Up: Including the Experiences of Romani Women” by Alexandra Oprea, a paper that:

… centres on the exclusion of Romani women from mainstream feminist and antiracist discourses in Europe. This exclusion is explained through the lens of intersectionalism and problematic identity politics. It discusses their invisibility as perpetuated by programmes and reports from non-governmental organizations (NGOs). It explains the absence of Romani women from Romani and feminist discourses, the uncritical view of Romani culture, and the vulnerability of Romanian Romani women to domestic violence. It emphasizes that analyses of social problems must be performed from the bottom up, looking at the experiences of those who are multi-burdened, such as poor Romani women. The paper concludes by discussing the value of recognizing privilege as the foundation for inclusive scholarship and discourse.

Several other analyses in addition to the sources here:

“The Erasure of Romani Women in Statistical Data: Limits of the Race-versus-Gender Approach” by Alexandra Oprea

“Child Marriage a Cultural Problem, Educational Access a Race Issue? Deconstructing Uni-Dimensional Understanding of Romani Oppression” by Alexandra Oprea

“Double Discrimination Faced by Romani Women in Europe” by Angela Kocze

“Breaking the Barriers – Romani Women and Access to Public Health Care”: European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia report

Also discussing mainstream bias and reactionaryism to anti-discrimination work, the fact that “anti-Gypsyism is often combined with other types of discriminatory practices such as xenophobia, sexism and homophobia”…:

“Fourth arm of the state. Romania’s press becomes a willing partner in prejudice” by Valeriu Nicolae

update sept. 2008; a few other good materials:

“Economic Aspects of the Condition of Roma Women”, Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung, 2006 [PDF]

“A Place at the Policy Table: Report on the Roma Women’s Forum”, OSI, 2004

“Broadening the Agenda: The Status of Romani Women in Romania”, OSI, Laura Surdu and Mihai Surdu, 2006

“Romani Women: Between Two Cultures” in Bending the Bow. Targeting Women’s Human Rights and Opportunities. OSI, Network Women’s Program, 2003 (thanks c.)

“The Situation of Roma/Gypsy Women in Europe”, Nicoleta Bitu, 1999 (thanks c.)

more: Roma Women Association, Romania: Reports

Cartea “Copilul Vegetarian” – lansare pe 8 martie

Lansarea cartii “Copilul vegetarian” de Elena Pridie va avea loc joi 8 martie, ora 18, la sala publica din str. Labirint 116, Bucuresti. La eveniment vor participa medici (MedInvest, Dr. Stroescu, CSMPR Herghelia), firme (Sano Vita, Granovita) si Societatea Vegetarienilor din Romania. Recomandari, prefata si extrase din carte pot fi gasite aici.

COMUNICAT DE PRESA
Copilul vegetarian – “ba al nostru e mai sanatos”
Rm. Valcea, 27 februarie, 2007

Casa de Editura Advent anunta lansarea cartii „Copilul vegetarian”, sub semnatura autoarei Elena Pridie. Volumul, foarte asteptat pe o piata a alimentatiei sanatoase din ce in ce mai bogata si provocatoare in informatii si produse, vine sa umple un gol resimtit de-a lungul anilor: cum sa ne hranim copiii sanatos? Poate fi vegetarianismul un stil de viata optim chiar si pentru cei mici?

Elena Pridie a scris din nou. Ne-a scris din nou. Dupa zecile de mii de exemplare vandute din cele cinci titluri de pana acum, care o recomanda, fara indoiala, printre cele mai bine vandute autoare din Romania, Elena Pridie a ales sa scrie o carte cu totul noua. Probabil ca aceasta trebuia sa fie prima. Iar daca abia acum iese pe piata, este doar pentru ca experienta acumulata sa asigure temelia unui mesaj pe cat de provocator, pe atat de vrednic de a fi implinit.

Dincolo de gospodina eficienta, de femeia care tine intreaga casa si masa printr-o administrare inteleapta – tinta constanta a titlurilor anterioare – Elena Pridie pluseaza acum o imagine cu cel mai mare impact in familie: sanatatea copiilor nostri.
Continue reading

hartuirea sexuala normala

… in destul de multe ziare (Ziua, Romania Libera, Jurnalul National am apucat sa citesc, am auzit si discutii la radiouri FM din Bucuresti) au aparut articole mari (1/2, o pagina) despre un studiu facut de Centrul pentru Parteneriat pentru Egalitate … despre hartuirea sexuala.
Studiul a fost facut de IMAS in Iasi, Constanta, Cluj si Bucuresti, majoritatea celor chestionati sunt barbati, si concluziile sunt ca 90% dintre cei chestionati considera hartuirea sexuala o problema grava, dar doar 54% stiu ca exista o lege care pedepseste aceste fapte.
Atitudinea de blamare a victimei este inca foarte raspandita, majoritatea dintre respondenti chiar cred ca victima este cea care provoaca, prin tinuta si comportament.
Mai grav cred ca este faptul ca in Romania au fost facute doua sau trei plangeri, fara NICI O URMARE in ce priveste pedepsirea in vreun fel a hartuitorului, desi majoritatea au spus ca au fost victime sau au cunostinte/ prieteni victime ale hartuirii.
Centrul care a cerut studiul a facut si un ghid practic pentru persoana hartuita. …
a.

mai multe:
Pe site-ul Centrului Parteneriat pentru Egalitate, cu link la raport (Word)

Un comentariu cu date, informatii

“War Zone” (alte date si idei intr-un post mai vechi)

The Iroquois model for gender equity

“The Untold Story of The Iroquois Influence On Early Feminists”
by Sally Roesch Wagner

I had been haunted by a question to the past, a mystery of feminist history: How did the radical suffragists come to their vision, a vision not of Band-Aid reform but of a reconstituted world completely transformed?

For 20 years I had immersed myself in the writings of early United States women’s rights activists — Matilda Joslyn Gage (1826-1898), Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815-1902), Lucretia Mott (1793-1880) — yet I could not fathom how they dared to dream their revolutionary dream. Living under the ideological hegemony of nineteenth-century United States, they had no say in government, religion, economics, or social life (“the four-fold oppression” of their lives, Gage and Stanton called it.) Whatever made them think that human harmony — based on the perfect equality of all people, with women absolute sovereigns of their lives — was an achievable goal?

Surely these white women, living under conditions of virtual slavery, did not get their vision in a vacuum. Somehow they were able to see from point A, where they stood — corseted, ornamental, legally nonpersons — to point C, the “regenerated” world Gage predicted, in which all repressive institutions would be destroyed. What was point B in their lives, the earthly alternative that drove their feminist spirit — not a utopian pipe dream but a sensible, do-able paradigm?

Then I realized I had been skimming over the source of their inspiration without noticing it. My own unconscious white supremacy had kept me from recognizing what these prototypical feminists kept insisting in their writings: They caught a glimpse of the possibility of freedom because they knew women who lived liberated lives, women who had always possessed rights beyond their wildest imagination — Iroquois women.

The more evidence I uncovered of this indelible Native American influence on the vision of early United States feminists, the more certain I became that this story must be told.

A Vision of Everyday Decency [more]

About the Iroquois Confederacy/Six Nations (Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, Seneca, Tuscarora Nations)

Matilda Joslyn Gage, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott

Elias Johnson, Legends, traditions and laws, of the Iroquois, or Six Nations, and history of the Tuscarora Indians

Paula Gunn Allen

Audrey Shenandoah activism

When Feminism Rocks. Revolution. Grrrl-style.

bk_rgsn0.jpg

Pentru un consumator de mainstream (rock sau nu) pare sa existe putine modele feminine in muzica, artiste care sa insemne mai mult decat interprete ale unor melodii foarte populare, compuse si produse de alti muzicieni. In spatele unei industrii rock suprasaturate de ‘masculi feroce’ chiar exista multe femei care manuiesc instrumente muzicale, care isi compun propria muzica, artiste care aleg ca mod de exprimare aceasta arta… Doar ca ele nu sunt la fel de proeminente ca Britney Spears.

O parte dintre aceste muziciene sunt incluse in miscarea Riot Grrrl (RG).

14.jpg

Riot Grrrl nu este doar o tendinta vestimentara[1] sau o ‘moda’ care sa dispara la scurt timp dupa ce a fost ‘lansata’, cum se intampla cu acest gen de fenomene. Riot Grrrl nu este doar un curent muzical, chiar daca muzica a jucat un rol foarte important in cadrul ei. Prin intermediul miscarii au fost discutate si rediscutate multe chestiuni politice si sociale legate de sexism, hartuire si abuz, homofobie si fat oppression[2], atat prin muzica, arta, cat si prin literatura, publicatii (zines[3]) si impartasirea unor experiente.
Contrar cu ceea ce unii sustin de la ‘media black out’-ul din toamna 1992, RG nu a disparut.[4]

Continue reading

Call for papers: Roma and Gadje

CALL FOR PAPERS: For a special issue of the Anthropology of East Europe Review on Roma and Gadje, scheduled for Fall 2007.
We are seeking papers that consider the ways Romani individuals and communities negotiate, resist and reproduce the places Roma occupy in the social and political contexts of non-Romani spheres, as well as sociological analyses of the lifeworlds and counterpublics of Roma.

As a liberal order consolidates throughout the Eastern European region, Roma everywhere are taken up either as (to borrow a term from Saidiya Hartman) the “imaginative surface” of the woes of postsocialism or as a romanticized remnant of a bygone past. Roma seem to exist in the shadow of culture – timeless, errant and enchantingly Other – while the social worlds they inhabit are circumscribed by their intensifying economic and spatial marginalization and the continued pathologization of their behavior as inadaptable and often criminal. The historical roots of such stereotyping run deep and resonate powerfully in our particular moment: the Zigeuner/Tigani/Cikán/Cigany Other continues to function within discussions of transnational European identities, even as these discourses claim a complete break with the ethnonational identities of the past. Gadje, in turn, are rarely, if ever, explicitly implicated in the public figurations of difference through which Romani and Gadje identities are mutually constituted and that set the terms of much of the scholarly and activist engagement with Romani lives.

We seek contributions that situate their analysis within this specular constitution of otherness in specific historical, political and social milieux. How are individual Roma and Gadje interpolated by the dynamic and shifting boundaries that inform the dialectics of identity? What are the micro-physics of the negotiations along this border, and how do they sustain the production of difference? How are the ambiguities and indeterminacies encountered along these borders stabilized and made commensurate in acts of recognition (or rejection) of otherness? And how does the figuration of Zigeuner/Tigani/Cikán/Cigany difference symbolically secure the emergent political orders in the eastward progression of “Europeanization?”
Continue reading

creiere “diferite”

evenimentul zilei a publicat recent un articol din care aflam ca “expertii americani” au determinat ca “Diferentele dintre barbati si femei se pot vedea inca de la nastere”, mai exact “Creierul femeilor difera de cel al barbatilor. De aici, neintelegerile.” si de unde vin aceste concluzii noi si inovatoare? potrivit articolului, se pare ca ele sunt “sustinute” de o gama larga de observatii privind conformatia biologica si comportamentul social ale celor doua sexe, de la: “creierul barbatilor are in plus doua miliarde de neuroni, dar la femei cantitatea de substanta din care sunt alcatuite dendritele, axonii si sinapsele este mai mare, ceea ce inseamna ca celulele din creier comunica mai bine intre ele” la “femeile spun in jur de 20.000 de cuvinte pe zi, in timp ce barbatii doar 7.000”, la “barbatii cu testiculul drept si femeile cu sanul drept mai mari tind sa dezvolte un comportament preponderent masculin. Daca, in schimb, testiculul si sanul stang sunt mai mari, comportamentul este mai apropiat de cel feminin”.

ciudat, eu citind acest tip de observatii as determina mai degraba ca nu putem spune nimic definitiv despre cit de biologice sint diferentele dintre categoria “femei” si categoria “barbati” si nici cum se aliniaza datele biologice la ce numin “masculinitate” si “femininitate”. acesta este comentariul meu pe evz online:

CEL mai interesant e ca … articolul nu citeaza pe nimeni, nu da nici un nume in afara de al profesoarei Doreen Kimura, care eu stiu ca a afirmat ca desi se pot gasi diferente intre barbati si femei, in medie, asemanarile sunt cu mult mai semnificative. Dar in fond acelasi lucru il spun si informatiile prezentate in articol, dincolo de comentariile editoriale de genul “Diferentele dintre femei si barbati sunt date de modurile distincte in care functioneaza creierul” si “Razboiul mintilor” – diferentele, cand/daca exista, nu prea conteaza. Ceea ce este clar pentru oricine verifica datele reale, la fel cum este clar ca diferentele *in cadrul* aceluiasi sex sunt mai mari decat cele *dintre* sexe. Ideea ca unul din sexe are creierul/IQ-ul/etc. “mai mare” este la fel de (ne)fondata (si din start subiectiva) ca si cea ca una dintre rase ar fi mai inteligenta. Deci cine sunt acesti “experti americani” mentionati in articol, ce au spus ei de fapt si daca au oferit aceleasi interpretari ca D-na Ramona Samoila ni se poate explica – printre altele – oare cum au reusit sa separe efectul socializarii de vreun dat biologic (in privinta folosirii cuvintelor, de exemplu)? Oare ce inseamna “masculin” si “feminin”, de unde se trag aceste definitii si ce legatura are asta cu sexul biologic al fiecarei persoane?

In rest, miezul articolului de fata nu face decat sa fie de acord cu felul in care ii crestem si conditionam pe copii. Ce e nou – sau stiintific – in asta?

si ar fi multe de spus, unii chiar le-au spus deja:

  • “‘Men smarter than women’ claims dodgy science”
  • “Are men smarter?”
  • “Breaking news: Men smarter than women except for the ones that aren’t”
  • – dar pentru mine punctul din urma, ca “barbatii sunt mai destepti decat femeile, in afara de cei care nu sint” (si viceversa), acopera cam tot. desigur, n-as vrea sa deranjez cumva starea de confort a oamenilor pentru care e esential in viata sa creada in teorii ca cea ca unul din sexe e mai destept decit altul… oh, wait, yes i do.

    semnat,
    100% “male brain”-girl (?!?).

    BOOK REVIEW: “A Brief History of Misogyny” by Jack Holland

    A Brief History of Misogyny: The World’s Oldest Prejudice, by Jack Holland
    (London: Constable & Robinson Ltd, 2006, ISBN 1-84529-371- 1) 320 pp.

    Book review by Joy Wood

    Summary

    Jack Holland gives a background to his perceived origins of the misogyny we see today. One of the main strands is ancient Greek thought, and the other is Christianity and related monotheistic religions. The Greek myth of Pandora (p13) echoes the Jewish Adam and Eve myth, in that the original human was man. In the Pandora myth, men were alone until the demi-god Prometheus, who had created men, stole fire from heaven so that they would not have to eat meat raw, like animals. According to Hesiod, Zeus punished the theft by creating Pandora as a ‘gift’ for men. When Pandora disobeyed the command not to open the box she let loose “pains and evils among men” (p14). She was to blame for men being subject to all the ills of life on earth. A central belief of both Greek and Judeo-Christian thought is that man was created separately from the animals, ie above them. This may be a key to misogyny; because men desire women, they ‘give in’ to their animal nature against their will (the Greek phrase for Pandora translates as ‘the beautiful evil’ (p13)) and then blame their lack of willpower on the ‘earthiness’ of women rather than accept their own human nature. Consequently men dehumanise women (by equating the latter with nature) and hold them in contempt. Compounding the effect of the Pandora myth, Greek philosophy and science affirmed this dualistic view of man -v- nature. Aristotle held that women’s role in pregnancy was as an incubator, to carry the male seed, which backs up the idea that men are independent of women, and that women are more animal-like. The so-called cradle of democracy, Ancient Greece, was a slave-owning state, as was Ancient Rome (p20).

    Holland holds that “Plato’s Theory of Forms is the philosophical basis for the Christian doctrine of Original Sin” (p31). He maintains that the Theory of Forms (which elevated ‘thought’ as the true Reality, with a capital ‘R’) provided a powerful philosophical basis to the allegories of both Pandora and the Fall of Man and introduced the dualistic vision of reality, where man forever fights against the world of the senses and, because it was woman which caused the split from God, man despises her since she stands to remind him that he too is only human. Holland displays a dry sense of humour; on page 32 he quotes Bertrand Russell who said, in response to the claim by Aristotle (as proof of their inferiority) that women have fewer teeth than men, “Aristotle would never have made this mistake if he had allowed his wife to open her mouth once in a while.”

    “Aristotle also introduced the concept of purpose as fundamental to science” (p32). He maintained that women were inferior to men and made to be ruled by men and to carry the man’s child. A ‘scientific’ belief that women are mere vessels led to the denial of their humanity. Moreover, Aristotle claimed that an excess of menstrual fluid in the mother’s womb means the child will not reach its full human potential but become female instead because, as Aristotle says, “the female is, as it were, a mutilated male” (p33). Deformed and sickly male babies and ‘mutilated males’ (ie girl children) were abandoned because of this Aristotelian belief, and the practice carried on throughout antiquity until Christianity became the dominant religion of the Roman Empire (p33) (although of course selective abortion and abandonment of female babies goes on today in parts of India and China). Not all females died, however, since exposed infants were automatically reduced to slave status, so brothel keepers raised some of them as prostitutes (p34).

    Holland moves from Ancient Greece, though the Roman Empire to the roots of Christianity. At page 72 he lightens the tone a little. After a quote from Isaiah, 3:16-24 where God lists the dreadful things he will do to women who dress up in finery and parade about, Holland responds with, “The God of the Old Testament was remarkable, if not unique, among divinities, in being both grandiose and extraordinarily petty, one minute creating the universe, the next making women’s hair fall out.” The Old Testament, in common with Platonic thought, disparages the pleasures of the flesh. As Holland puts it, “Homosexuality was forbidden, as was any wasteful spilling of man’s seed, including sodomy, masturbation and oral sex. Not a drop could be spared from the business of begetting” (p71). Holland finds similarities between St Paul and Plato, including that the equality they offered for women with men could only be granted if women became like men. For Plato, this was for the elite women who became Guardians along with the elite group of men and, for St Paul, sexual differences disappear in the Kingdom of Heaven (p79). According to Holland, when St Augustine read Platonic works he could equate The Idea, The Pure Form with God and although Origen was the first to begin to synthesise Platonic thought with Jewish scriptures, it was St Augustine “the greatest thinker since Plato” who established the philosophical edifice which propped up Christianity, “including its misogynistic vision” (p90). Augustine was concerned with breaking away from bodily desires. The only way Mary, the ‘mother of God’ could be venerated was if she was a virgin, and had not felt any sexual desire when conceiving Jesus (in other words, she was unlike any other woman) (p102). This echoes the doctrine of Plato – the dualistic split from, and denigration of, the body. As Holland puts it, “The ‘Word became Flesh’ signalled the end of dualism but the cult of the Virgin Mary meant that the old contempt for matter was perpetuated” (p103). Pope Innocent III permanently barred women from hearing confession and preaching and in everyday life he advocated that men make use of women as a necessary object “who is needed to preserve the species or to provide food and drink” (p112).
    Continue reading

    Postgraduate Course in Dubrovnik: Feminist Critical Analysis: Race, Discourse, Biopolitics

    Postgraduate Course in Dubrovnik
    Feminist Critical Analysis: Race, Discourse, Biopolitics

    INTER-UNIVERSITY CENTER
    DUBROVNIK, CROATIA

    May , 21st – 25th 2007

    Call for Proposals

    Rutgers (State University of New Jersey) Women’s and Gender Studies
    Department and Belgrade Women’s Studies and Gender Research Center,
    Belgrade University are pleased to announce the 8th annual postgraduate course in Feminist Critical Analysis: Race, Discourse, Biopolitics. The course will be held at the Inter-University Centre, Dubrovnik (http://www.hr/iuc/) on May 21st – 25th, 2007. The course will be co-directed by Dasa Duhacek of the Belgrade Women´s Studies, Belgrade Universirty and Ethel Brooks of the Women’s and Gender Studies Department, Rutgers University.

    Continue reading

    Inegalitatea dintre sexe agraveaza saracia

    11 Decembrie, 2006 (BBC Romania)

    Organizatia ONU pentru copii, UNICEF, publica luni raportul anual privind situatia copiilor in lume.

    Dar, spre deosebire de anii precedenti, raportul se concentreaza nu pe aspecte anume ale vietii copiilor si pe vietile femeilor.

    UNICEF cere guvernelor sa faca mai multe eforturi pentru a impune egalitatea intre sexe care, subliniaza organizatia, va insemna nu doar vieti mai bune pentru femei ci si pentru copii lor.

    Potrivit UNICEF, capacitatea femeilor de a decide asupra propriilor vieti este indeaproape legata de sanatatea si bunastarea copiilor.

    intregul articol [mai putin decat profesionale si necesare, comentariile editoriale despre faptul ca “raportul nu va fi o lectura placuta pentru barbati” si UNICEF-ul nu cere “instaurarea matriarhatului”!]

    pentru detalii:
    Comunicatul UNICEF privind raportul

    … The report argues that recent progress in women’s status has not come far enough. Millions of girls and women continue to live in poverty, disempowered and discriminated against. They are disproportionately affected by HIV/AIDS, less likely to attend school and often subject to physical and sexual violence. In most places, men continue to earn more pay than women for the same jobs.

    Women need a voice
    … Empowering women, explains the report, saves children’s lives – and the impact is too important to ignore. … Moreover, the report finds, in families where women are the main decision-makers, a far greater proportion of household resources is devoted to child health, nutrition and education than in families where women do not have a voice.

    Seven key interventions
    The report suggests seven key interventions for gender equality:

    * Abolish school fees and invest in girls’ education
    * Invest government funding in gender equality
    * Enact legislation to create a level playing field for women, and to prevent and respond to domestic violence as well as gender-based violence in conflict
    * Ensure women’s participation in politics
    * Involve women’s grassroots organizations early on in policy development
    * Engage men and boys so the importance of gender equality can be understood by all
    * Improve research and data on gender issues, which are critical if progress is to be made

    Promoting gender equality is the focus of Millennium Development Goal 3. If this goal is achieved, UNICEF believes its benefits will be felt not just among women and children but in many other spheres—from poverty and hunger reduction to global health and environmental sustainability.

    The State of the World’s Children 2007 shows that in the long run, empowering women will enhance efforts to reach all of the other Millennium Development Goals by 2015.

    ———————————–

    Stire UNICEF din 18 Octombrie 2006:
    Unul din patru copii traieste in saracie

    Un raport al Agentiei Natiunilor Unite pentru copii, UNICEF, arata ca in Europa de est, Asia Centrala si Rusia unul din patru copii traieste in saracie, in ciuda cresterii economice din aceste regiuni.