creiere “diferite”

evenimentul zilei a publicat recent un articol din care aflam ca “expertii americani” au determinat ca “Diferentele dintre barbati si femei se pot vedea inca de la nastere”, mai exact “Creierul femeilor difera de cel al barbatilor. De aici, neintelegerile.” si de unde vin aceste concluzii noi si inovatoare? potrivit articolului, se pare ca ele sunt “sustinute” de o gama larga de observatii privind conformatia biologica si comportamentul social ale celor doua sexe, de la: “creierul barbatilor are in plus doua miliarde de neuroni, dar la femei cantitatea de substanta din care sunt alcatuite dendritele, axonii si sinapsele este mai mare, ceea ce inseamna ca celulele din creier comunica mai bine intre ele” la “femeile spun in jur de 20.000 de cuvinte pe zi, in timp ce barbatii doar 7.000”, la “barbatii cu testiculul drept si femeile cu sanul drept mai mari tind sa dezvolte un comportament preponderent masculin. Daca, in schimb, testiculul si sanul stang sunt mai mari, comportamentul este mai apropiat de cel feminin”.

ciudat, eu citind acest tip de observatii as determina mai degraba ca nu putem spune nimic definitiv despre cit de biologice sint diferentele dintre categoria “femei” si categoria “barbati” si nici cum se aliniaza datele biologice la ce numin “masculinitate” si “femininitate”. acesta este comentariul meu pe evz online:

CEL mai interesant e ca … articolul nu citeaza pe nimeni, nu da nici un nume in afara de al profesoarei Doreen Kimura, care eu stiu ca a afirmat ca desi se pot gasi diferente intre barbati si femei, in medie, asemanarile sunt cu mult mai semnificative. Dar in fond acelasi lucru il spun si informatiile prezentate in articol, dincolo de comentariile editoriale de genul “Diferentele dintre femei si barbati sunt date de modurile distincte in care functioneaza creierul” si “Razboiul mintilor” – diferentele, cand/daca exista, nu prea conteaza. Ceea ce este clar pentru oricine verifica datele reale, la fel cum este clar ca diferentele *in cadrul* aceluiasi sex sunt mai mari decat cele *dintre* sexe. Ideea ca unul din sexe are creierul/IQ-ul/etc. “mai mare” este la fel de (ne)fondata (si din start subiectiva) ca si cea ca una dintre rase ar fi mai inteligenta. Deci cine sunt acesti “experti americani” mentionati in articol, ce au spus ei de fapt si daca au oferit aceleasi interpretari ca D-na Ramona Samoila ni se poate explica – printre altele – oare cum au reusit sa separe efectul socializarii de vreun dat biologic (in privinta folosirii cuvintelor, de exemplu)? Oare ce inseamna “masculin” si “feminin”, de unde se trag aceste definitii si ce legatura are asta cu sexul biologic al fiecarei persoane?

In rest, miezul articolului de fata nu face decat sa fie de acord cu felul in care ii crestem si conditionam pe copii. Ce e nou – sau stiintific – in asta?

si ar fi multe de spus, unii chiar le-au spus deja:

  • “‘Men smarter than women’ claims dodgy science”
  • “Are men smarter?”
  • “Breaking news: Men smarter than women except for the ones that aren’t”
  • – dar pentru mine punctul din urma, ca “barbatii sunt mai destepti decat femeile, in afara de cei care nu sint” (si viceversa), acopera cam tot. desigur, n-as vrea sa deranjez cumva starea de confort a oamenilor pentru care e esential in viata sa creada in teorii ca cea ca unul din sexe e mai destept decit altul… oh, wait, yes i do.

    semnat,
    100% “male brain”-girl (?!?).

    Recenzie a evenimentului Ladyfest Romania pentru cele 16 zile contra violentei

    publicata in revista Beyond Gender a GAD Committee – Romania:

    bg_winter06_p9.jpg bg_winter06_p10.jpg — de Cristina

    Resurse:

  • BROSURA LF ANTI-VIOLENTA
  • Mai multe despre War Zone
  • Mai multe despre Take Back the Night
  • Versiunea in limba romana a recenziei: Continue reading

    Monologurile vaginului – AUDITIE 6-7 feb. 2007

    Asociatia social culturala Baraka organizeaza in cadrul campaniei mondiale Ziua V o reprezentatie a piesei “Monologurile Vaginului”, a autoarei americane Eve Ensler, alaturi de cateva alte evenimente complementare.

    Vrei sa fii parte a echipei de actori?

    Poti ajuta evenimentul si ca voluntar!!! Sau ca membru al echipei tehnice de realizare a piesei de teatru. Nu exista nici o conditie in acest sens decat sa ne contactezi si sa fii motivat sa lucrezi alaturi de noi!

    Trimite formularul de inscriere la: asociatia.baraka@gmail.com pana pe 5 februarie 2007 sau suna la unul din telefoanele de mai jos:

    V Day Bucuresti secretariat:
    Ana Gradinariu: 0724129394
    Cristina Spanu: 0722676704

    Descarca formularul de inscriere AICI

    Exista, in principiu, o singura conditie: sa fii femeie si sa iti conduci viata ca femeie. Si sa te simti confortabil cu textul piesei si aparitia pe scena. Cautam femei si fete din toate mediile sociale, nivelele educationale, de toate varstele, care cred ca problema violentei trebuie dezbatuta in societatea romaneasca. Daca cele de mai sus ti se potrivesc, atunci te invitam la auditie pe 6 -7 februarie 2007.

    Poti ajuta evenimentul si ca voluntar!!! Sau ca membru al echipei tehnice de realizare a piesei de teatru. Nu exista nici o conditie in acest sens decat sa ne contactezi si sa fii motivat sa lucrezi alaturi de noi!

    Participarea in proiect constituie munca de voluntariat pentru toate formele de implicare (actrite, echipa organizare, realizare materiale, promovare, parteneriate, etc.)

    Ziua V este o miscare la nivel mondial ce militeaza impotriva violentei impotriva femeilor. Ziua V este un catalizator pentru evenimente creative ce au ca obiective : constientizarea publicului, strangerea de fonduri si revitalizarea spiritului organizatiilor anti-violenta ce exista deja. Ziua V atrage atentia asupra luptei pentru incetarea violentei impotriva femeilor, incluzand violul, bataia, incestul, mutilarea genitala feminina si sclavia sexuala. Continue reading

    Some good international news

    from Women’s eNews:

    * Portugal, one of four European nations where most abortions are illegal, will vote next month in a referendum to liberalize its laws. The election occurs amid efforts to challenge Portuguese and Irish anti-choice laws in European court.

    * Three hundred men have joined a Burlington, Vermont, U.S., campaign against domestic abuse, the Burlington Press reported Jan. 23. Members of the White Ribbon Campaign, which was formed last December, wear white ribbons to symbolize their commitment to challenging violence against women. Members agree to speak to at least one boy and man to raise awareness.

    * A group of Israeli women has petitioned the nation’s high court to prohibit bus companies from telling women to sit in the back in Orthodox Jewish neighborhoods, Reuters reported Jan. 24. Some members of the Orthodox sects of Judaism follow teachings that ban any public contact between men and women. The Israeli government has recently backed transport companies that run gender-divided buses on 30 public routes.

    * The United Nations will deploy its first all-female peacekeeping force to the conflict-torn West African nation of Liberia on Jan. 29, the Associated Press reported. The 103-member team, which has trained since September and is drawn from India, will help conduct local elections and assist with prison security.

    * Under pressure from activists and eager for approval to join the European Union, Turkey has launched a major campaign against honor killings, the Los Angeles Times reported Jan 21. Pop stars and soccer celebrities have produced TV spots and billboard ads condemning violence against women, while Turkish imams have declared honor killings a sin.

    * More than 500 international manufacturers of cosmetic and body care products have vowed to eliminate toxic ingredients from their products, the San Francisco-based Campaign for Safe Cosmetics announced Jan. 25. The pledge’s signatories have agreed to replace ingredients linked with cancer, hormone imbalances and birth anomalies with safer alternatives by 2010.

    * Saudi Arabia’s most prominent princess, Lolwah Al-Faisal, said that she would allow women to drive if she were queen for a day during comments made at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, the Times of London reported Jan. 25. Al-Faisal is vice-chair of the board of trustees and general supervisor of Jeddah’s Effat College. Her remark was broadly received as a direct challenge to the nation’s driving ban, imposed by religious order in 1990.

    * When Israel holds a high-level meeting on national security starting Jan. 21, Israeli women’s groups will meet on the sidelines to discuss the harmful effects of last summer’s war on Lebanon and recommend ways to defuse nuclear tensions in the region.

    * A U.K. labor union plans to bring a barrage of cases that will test the significance for female workers of a recent European Court of Justice decision. Advocates hope it will ease the penalty for taking time out of the paid work force.

    are women human ii

    Blog for Choice Day - January 22, 2007

    Scrisoare deschisa adresata Excelentei Sale, Domnului Ambasador al Potugaliei la Bucuresti

    De obicei, drepturile femeilor nu sunt recunoscute ca drepturi ale omului, ceea ce are consecinte grave asupra modului in care societatea priveste si trateaza chestiunile fundamentale legate de vietile femeilor.

    Pe data 18 ianuarie 2007, s-au implinit 5 ani de cand 17 femei au fost judecate, in Portugalia, pentru ca au recurs la avort.
    In Portugalia, din 1998, avortul – cu exceptia celui efectuat ca urmare a unui viol – este considerat infractiune, sanctionata cu pana la 3 ani de inchisoare. Anual, 40.000 de femei recurg la avort in secret, cel putin 5000 dintre acestea ajungand la sectiile de urgenta din cauza complicatiilor.
    La sfarsitul anului 2006, Parlamentul Portugaliei a votat pentru un referendum, in data de 11.02.2007, in favoarea legalizarii avortului in primele 10 saptamani de sarcina.
    Credem ca experienta tragica a femeilor din Romania poate fi invocata in sprijinul demersului nostru pentru respectarea dreptului femeii de a decide in privinta propriului corp.
    Intre 1966 si 1989 avortul a fost interzis in Romania. Avand ca principala cauza avortul ilegal, in 1989, in Romania, rata mortalitatii materne a fost cea mai mare inregistrata vreodata in Europa. Femei altfel sanatoase au murit ca urmare a hemoragiei post-abortive, sepsis, traume abdominale si otravire. Numai intre 1976 si 1989 au murit din cauza practicarii avorturilor ilegale 7280 femei. In realitate, acest numar este mult mai mare intrucat, subiectul de referinta al acestor statistici fiind decesele materne, pentru a “rotunji prin diminuare” statisticile, femeile gravide care nu aveau copii nu erau incluse in numaratoarea statistica a acestei categorii de decese, ca si tinerele care ramasesera gravide fara a fi casatorite.

    Recunoastem consecintele negative la care poate fi supusa o femeie ca urmare a efectuarii unui avort, insa consideram ca acestea pot fi diminuate sau eliminate numai prin educatie si nu prin criminalizarea avortului, arestand femeia care l-a practicat.
    Semnatarele/semnatarii acestei scrisori deschise considera dreptul femeii la avort ca o inalta valoare a unei societati demoratice.
    Cum problema efectuarii unui avort este una de constiinta si a carei rezolvare trebuie sa ramana, in mod evident, la decizia femeii, dorim sa ne anuntam solidaritatea cu persoanele, organizatiile sau institutiile care militeaza pentru decriminalizarea avortului in Portugalia.

    Mihaela Miroiu, Profesor,
    National School of Political Studies and Public Administration
    Oana Baluta, Centrul Curricular de Studii de Gen FILIA, Bucuresti
    Alina Dragolea, Centrul Curricular de Studii de Gen FILIA, Bucuresti
    Emil Moise, Asociatia Solidaritatea pentru Libertatea de Constiinta, oficiul Buzau
    [in curind, forma finala a scrisorii cu lista completa de semnaturi]

    lectura suplimentara:
    despre legalizarea avortului in portugalia (en)
    – in romana “avortul: ‘ultima solutie’ in loc de ‘singura solutie'” din jurnalul societatii de analize feministe ana si in engleza “abortion” de bitch ph.d.
    women on waves foundation

    BOOK REVIEW: “A Brief History of Misogyny” by Jack Holland

    A Brief History of Misogyny: The World’s Oldest Prejudice, by Jack Holland
    (London: Constable & Robinson Ltd, 2006, ISBN 1-84529-371- 1) 320 pp.

    Book review by Joy Wood

    Summary

    Jack Holland gives a background to his perceived origins of the misogyny we see today. One of the main strands is ancient Greek thought, and the other is Christianity and related monotheistic religions. The Greek myth of Pandora (p13) echoes the Jewish Adam and Eve myth, in that the original human was man. In the Pandora myth, men were alone until the demi-god Prometheus, who had created men, stole fire from heaven so that they would not have to eat meat raw, like animals. According to Hesiod, Zeus punished the theft by creating Pandora as a ‘gift’ for men. When Pandora disobeyed the command not to open the box she let loose “pains and evils among men” (p14). She was to blame for men being subject to all the ills of life on earth. A central belief of both Greek and Judeo-Christian thought is that man was created separately from the animals, ie above them. This may be a key to misogyny; because men desire women, they ‘give in’ to their animal nature against their will (the Greek phrase for Pandora translates as ‘the beautiful evil’ (p13)) and then blame their lack of willpower on the ‘earthiness’ of women rather than accept their own human nature. Consequently men dehumanise women (by equating the latter with nature) and hold them in contempt. Compounding the effect of the Pandora myth, Greek philosophy and science affirmed this dualistic view of man -v- nature. Aristotle held that women’s role in pregnancy was as an incubator, to carry the male seed, which backs up the idea that men are independent of women, and that women are more animal-like. The so-called cradle of democracy, Ancient Greece, was a slave-owning state, as was Ancient Rome (p20).

    Holland holds that “Plato’s Theory of Forms is the philosophical basis for the Christian doctrine of Original Sin” (p31). He maintains that the Theory of Forms (which elevated ‘thought’ as the true Reality, with a capital ‘R’) provided a powerful philosophical basis to the allegories of both Pandora and the Fall of Man and introduced the dualistic vision of reality, where man forever fights against the world of the senses and, because it was woman which caused the split from God, man despises her since she stands to remind him that he too is only human. Holland displays a dry sense of humour; on page 32 he quotes Bertrand Russell who said, in response to the claim by Aristotle (as proof of their inferiority) that women have fewer teeth than men, “Aristotle would never have made this mistake if he had allowed his wife to open her mouth once in a while.”

    “Aristotle also introduced the concept of purpose as fundamental to science” (p32). He maintained that women were inferior to men and made to be ruled by men and to carry the man’s child. A ‘scientific’ belief that women are mere vessels led to the denial of their humanity. Moreover, Aristotle claimed that an excess of menstrual fluid in the mother’s womb means the child will not reach its full human potential but become female instead because, as Aristotle says, “the female is, as it were, a mutilated male” (p33). Deformed and sickly male babies and ‘mutilated males’ (ie girl children) were abandoned because of this Aristotelian belief, and the practice carried on throughout antiquity until Christianity became the dominant religion of the Roman Empire (p33) (although of course selective abortion and abandonment of female babies goes on today in parts of India and China). Not all females died, however, since exposed infants were automatically reduced to slave status, so brothel keepers raised some of them as prostitutes (p34).

    Holland moves from Ancient Greece, though the Roman Empire to the roots of Christianity. At page 72 he lightens the tone a little. After a quote from Isaiah, 3:16-24 where God lists the dreadful things he will do to women who dress up in finery and parade about, Holland responds with, “The God of the Old Testament was remarkable, if not unique, among divinities, in being both grandiose and extraordinarily petty, one minute creating the universe, the next making women’s hair fall out.” The Old Testament, in common with Platonic thought, disparages the pleasures of the flesh. As Holland puts it, “Homosexuality was forbidden, as was any wasteful spilling of man’s seed, including sodomy, masturbation and oral sex. Not a drop could be spared from the business of begetting” (p71). Holland finds similarities between St Paul and Plato, including that the equality they offered for women with men could only be granted if women became like men. For Plato, this was for the elite women who became Guardians along with the elite group of men and, for St Paul, sexual differences disappear in the Kingdom of Heaven (p79). According to Holland, when St Augustine read Platonic works he could equate The Idea, The Pure Form with God and although Origen was the first to begin to synthesise Platonic thought with Jewish scriptures, it was St Augustine “the greatest thinker since Plato” who established the philosophical edifice which propped up Christianity, “including its misogynistic vision” (p90). Augustine was concerned with breaking away from bodily desires. The only way Mary, the ‘mother of God’ could be venerated was if she was a virgin, and had not felt any sexual desire when conceiving Jesus (in other words, she was unlike any other woman) (p102). This echoes the doctrine of Plato – the dualistic split from, and denigration of, the body. As Holland puts it, “The ‘Word became Flesh’ signalled the end of dualism but the cult of the Virgin Mary meant that the old contempt for matter was perpetuated” (p103). Pope Innocent III permanently barred women from hearing confession and preaching and in everyday life he advocated that men make use of women as a necessary object “who is needed to preserve the species or to provide food and drink” (p112).
    Continue reading

    Support needed for the women of Oaxaca, Mexico

    WOMEN ALL OVER THE WORLD SUPPORT THE DEMANDS OF THE WOMEN OF OAXACA
    4 January 2007
    [edit: Traducerea si informatii suplimentare in romana]

    In November the Global women´s Strike met with women from Oaxaca, Mexico, and we committed ourselves to spreading information about their struggle, their demands, their leading participation in the Asamblea Popular de los Pueblos de Oaxaca (APPO) – Popular Assembly of the People of Oaxaca, the great unity it has achieved and the harsh repression attempting to defeat it.

    Your support is needed:

    – Sign and return this letter. We will forward it to the authorities and the media. Send protest emails and faxes to the authorities.

    – Donations. We are sending $1000 to the women of Oaxaca knowing that we can count on international support. We will send everything we collect.

    To send a donation in US dollars make cheques payable to Global Women´s Strike, PO Box 11795, Philadelphia, PA 19101, USA; in pound sterling to Global Women’s Strike, Crossroads Women’s Centre, 230a Kentish Town Road, London NW5 2AB, England; in euros to Huelga Mundial de Mujeres, Centro Las Mujeres Cuentan, Radas 27 Local, 08004 Barcelona, Spain or by bank transfer to Huelga Mundial de Mujeres, Caixa Penedes, IBAN: ES94 2081 0249 50 3300003442.
    Please write Oaxaca on the back of the cheque.

    – Circulate this information as widely as possible.

    BACKGROUND

    It is claimed that agriculture was born in Oaxaca (and in a few other regions of the world). Its historical has been given Humanity Cultural Heritage status. Oaxaca is a tourist city, expensive for its low income inhabitants. The majority live in Indigenous communities, poor neighbourhoods on the outskirts of the city (colonias), often headed by women whose husbands or sons have emigrated to other states or to the US in search of employment.

    Continue reading

    Noul “Spintecator”: violenta (impotriva femeilor) ca divertisment

    Cand e vorba de crime impotriva femeilor, se pare ca desi suntem in 2006 nu s-au schimbat prea multe de acum 30 (sau 100) de ani. Politia, presa, si majoritatea publicului nu gasesc nimic ciudat in a dezumaniza victimele si a trata violenta ca divertisment, iar crimele nu sunt adresate si rezolvate mai eficient. Se stie ca primul mars “Reclaim the Night” din Anglia s-a organizat in 1977 ca protest fata de o serie de omoruri cunoscute ca “Yorshire Ripper Murders”, si in special fata de faptul ca politia nu facea destul pentru siguranta femeilor si tinea sa deosebeasca “prostituatele” de “victime inocente”. Acum ca a aparut o situatie similara si 5 femei au fost deja omorate in Ipswich, Suffolk, MB, femeile sunt din nou indemnate sa nu iasa seara pe strazi. Este singura “solutie” si masura preventiva oferita de politie pe moment. In acelasi timp, felul in care se vorbeste despre victime (in principal ca “fete” si “prostituate”), sau detalii despre cat de “dezbracate” erau cand au fost gasite si atentia cu tente pozitive care i se da criminalului nu face decat sa dezumanizeze victimele si sa glorifice violenta.

    Citand-o pe Twisty de la I Blame the Patriarchy:

    “Ipswich spree killer: obviously dominated by women”

    Ipswich’s murdering psycho has been so obligingly villainous, the media have promoted him, in quaint British tradition, to ‘Ripper’ status. Men murder women all the time (about 11 times a day in the US alone), but ‘Ripper’ is the pet name reserved for a special class of male murderer who, in the popular imagination, is particularly evil, brilliant, fascinating, ruthless, predatory, depraved, cop-taunting, and of course, hooker-hating. He also has a grippingly seedy life history (”a loner who never fit in”), one that tabloid pop psychologists can modify into a reassuring, explanatory ‘motive’, or, even better, into a pyschokiller narrative revealing to a prurient public explicit, lingerie-ripping details of woman-hating violence.*

    In a departure from Rippers past, the Ipswich killer doesn’t mutilate. He wins the exalted ‘Ripper’ crown in part because of the stunning dispatch with which he ‘works’ — he is, it is noted unfailingly, and with a sangfroidesque blend of awe and admiration, the fastest serial killer in British history — but mostly because all his victims appear to have been female sex workers, an important prerequisite for Ripperdom.

    The Ipswich killer’s upgrade from random violent schlub to a mythic personage capable of waging “a campaign” means a concomitant downgrade for his victims. These people are demoted instantly from human women to ‘prostitutes,’ from ‘prostitutes’ ** to ‘vice girls’. From there it’s just a short hop to ‘heroin addicts’ and finally, to the lowest form of life imaginable, ’single mothers.’ Their first names are always used as if they were children. Tabloids, as Guardian columnist Joan Smith notes with dismay [in her article “Prostitutes deserve as much sympathy as any murder victim”], even allude to their hair color (“blonde Gemma”). It’s as though they were hotties in Hustler rather than murdered women; no report omits to describe the women’s corpses as ‘naked’ or ‘having been stripped.’

    Why celebrate the murderer and dehumanize the victims as fetish objects? Because the public is enamored of the delusion that only nutcase criminal masterminds hate women enough to murder them, and that prostitutes more or less have it coming to them.

    * The Sun’s ‘top criminal psychologist’ speculates that “the maniac [has a] history of being dominated by women.” Funny how every single woman on the planet has a history of being dominated by men, yet the world remains puzzlingly bereft of crazed chicks rampaging around on tabloid-quality murder sprees.

    Dar de ce ne-ar surprinde ca acestui criminal i se gasesc deja “circumstante atenuante”? Jack the Ripper este considerat un subiect fascinant, despre felul in care a mutilat si omorat femei se vorbeste cu mult interes si un minim de compasiune – mai ales ca si atunci victimele erau prostituate! “The Yorkshire Ripper”, care a omorat cel putin 13 femei, a fost lasat de curand sa viziteze locul unde se afla cenusa tatalui sau.

    Iar in presa romaneasca stirea despre omorurile recente poate fi gasita prezentata de parca ar fi vorba de o noua ecranizare a istoriei lui Jack the Ripper: “Jack Spintecatorul s-a intors: Dupa 118 ani, prostituatele britanice sunt in pericol din nou” (Ziua, 12 decembrie 2006) – un articol pe care InfoPortal.ro (“Indexul stirilor din Romania”) il indexeaza la sectiunea de “Divertisment”!

    —-

    Zilele acestea se incearca pregatirea unui Reclaim the Night ca raspuns la situatia din Ipswich.

    Inegalitatea dintre sexe agraveaza saracia

    11 Decembrie, 2006 (BBC Romania)

    Organizatia ONU pentru copii, UNICEF, publica luni raportul anual privind situatia copiilor in lume.

    Dar, spre deosebire de anii precedenti, raportul se concentreaza nu pe aspecte anume ale vietii copiilor si pe vietile femeilor.

    UNICEF cere guvernelor sa faca mai multe eforturi pentru a impune egalitatea intre sexe care, subliniaza organizatia, va insemna nu doar vieti mai bune pentru femei ci si pentru copii lor.

    Potrivit UNICEF, capacitatea femeilor de a decide asupra propriilor vieti este indeaproape legata de sanatatea si bunastarea copiilor.

    intregul articol [mai putin decat profesionale si necesare, comentariile editoriale despre faptul ca “raportul nu va fi o lectura placuta pentru barbati” si UNICEF-ul nu cere “instaurarea matriarhatului”!]

    pentru detalii:
    Comunicatul UNICEF privind raportul

    … The report argues that recent progress in women’s status has not come far enough. Millions of girls and women continue to live in poverty, disempowered and discriminated against. They are disproportionately affected by HIV/AIDS, less likely to attend school and often subject to physical and sexual violence. In most places, men continue to earn more pay than women for the same jobs.

    Women need a voice
    … Empowering women, explains the report, saves children’s lives – and the impact is too important to ignore. … Moreover, the report finds, in families where women are the main decision-makers, a far greater proportion of household resources is devoted to child health, nutrition and education than in families where women do not have a voice.

    Seven key interventions
    The report suggests seven key interventions for gender equality:

    * Abolish school fees and invest in girls’ education
    * Invest government funding in gender equality
    * Enact legislation to create a level playing field for women, and to prevent and respond to domestic violence as well as gender-based violence in conflict
    * Ensure women’s participation in politics
    * Involve women’s grassroots organizations early on in policy development
    * Engage men and boys so the importance of gender equality can be understood by all
    * Improve research and data on gender issues, which are critical if progress is to be made

    Promoting gender equality is the focus of Millennium Development Goal 3. If this goal is achieved, UNICEF believes its benefits will be felt not just among women and children but in many other spheres—from poverty and hunger reduction to global health and environmental sustainability.

    The State of the World’s Children 2007 shows that in the long run, empowering women will enhance efforts to reach all of the other Millennium Development Goals by 2015.

    ———————————–

    Stire UNICEF din 18 Octombrie 2006:
    Unul din patru copii traieste in saracie

    Un raport al Agentiei Natiunilor Unite pentru copii, UNICEF, arata ca in Europa de est, Asia Centrala si Rusia unul din patru copii traieste in saracie, in ciuda cresterii economice din aceste regiuni.