pozitivi cu hate speech-ul

nu stiu de ce obsesia cu desteptaciunea lor (in contrast cu prostia altora) e o trasatura atit de caracteristica bully-ilor… cu cit mai mai egoist, macho si pus pe hate speech e cineva, cu atit mai des pare sa faca declaratii despre “cretinitatea” din jur; mai mult, cu atit mai convins pare sa fie ca astfel de declaratii/acuzatii sint argumente. hm…

despre parazitii, ultimul lor album “slalom printre cretini” si un interviu in care isi etaleaza atit non-cretinitatea sclipitoare cit si atitudinea “pozitiva” @ pumukli:

Rasisti, misogini, homofobi, dar pozitivi!

Chiar daca nu imi plac, fac parte din a noastra mandra cultura si au influenta – probabil mai mare decat un clip antidiscriminare dat la TV de nici nu apuci sa il vezi – si, ma rog, confirma simtamintele multora dintre romani. E vorba de Parazitii si al lor album Slalom printre cretini. Din pacate, multi tineri rebeli si probabil entelectali ii asculta…. Iata neste versuri si explicatii date de ei.

“Ma pis pe gay si nu-i normal ca copiii sa vada homosexuali lingadu-se pe strada ()Sa trimitem bulangii in pachet la Barcelona”. Explicatie Parazitii : Este o gluma. Daca as putea sa-i trimit pe toti la Barcelona , i-as trimite si n-ar mai fi o gluma. Eu nu vreau sa-mi cresc copiii printre barbati care se saruta in fata lor”.

Noi romanii, “nu cersim cu handicapul la vedere si nu ghicim in palma in dughene mizere”. Explicatie Parazitii : De ce nu avem voie sa spunem ceea ce credem? De ce trebuie sa protejam atat ideea de minoritate?

Iar femeile, ia ghici? sunt proaste si curve. Explicatie Parazitii : Si pana sa facem noi piesele nu se simteau? Inseamna ca aveau o problema…. Insa exista si exceptii.

Si cireasa de pe tort: “Mesajul nostru este absolut pozitiv!” Really??? Tot interviul aici. O piesa aici.

glosar de gen, violenta, discriminare multipla

niste resurse institutionale (si info in plus):

de la CPE
“Intrebari frecvente”
– glosar de termeni “de gen”:
Ce inseamna actiune afirmativa (positive action)? / De ce avem nevoie de egalitatea de sanse pentru femei si barbati? / Ce inseamna gen social (gender)? / Ce sunt stereotipurile de gen? / Ce este traficul de persoane? / De ce sunt oamenii traficati? / Reprezinta oare prostitutia singurul scop pentru care oamenii sunt traficati? / Sunt oare femeile singura categorie de persoane traficate?/ Care este diferenta intre „Femeia in dezvoltare” si „Gen si dezvoltare”? / Ce este “Gender mainstreaming”? / Ce este “Empowerment”? / La ce se refera conceptul de „Balanta de Gen”? / Ce se are in vedere prin expimarea ca o initiativa/proiect/activitate este „Gender-Ignoranta”? / In ce consta conceptul de „Egalitate de Gen”? / In ce consta conceptul de “Echitate de Gen”? / Ce se are in vedere prin „Dezvoltarea Capacitatilor”? / Ce defineste conceptul „Sensibil din punct de vedere Gender”? / La ce se refera „Relatiile de Gender” / Ce este “Leadership”? / Ce inseamna violenta impotriva femeii? / Care sunt tipurile de violenta impotriva femeii? / Ce este violenta domestica? / Cine sunt victimele violentei domestice? / Ce este abuzul?
(alte definitii in glosarul lf-ro: Actiune afirmativa / Analiza din perspectiva (egalitatii) de gen / Androcentrism / Autoritate / Barbati homosexuali (barbati gay / faggot / fags) / Capitalism de consum / Coming out /coming out of the closet / Comodificare (sau obiectificare) / Constructie sociala / Cultura violului (rape culture) / Deconstruire / Determinism biologic / Diferenta / Discriminare / Dubla constrangere / Dublu standard / Dyke / Epistemologie / Esentialism / Feminism / Feminism: valuri / Feminism: tipuri / Gay / Gen / Gender mainstreaming / Genderqueer / Globalizare / Heteronormativitate / Heterosexismul / Homofobia / Identitate sexuala (sexual identity) / Ideologie dominanta / Ierarhie / (In)egalitate de gen / Institutie / Intersexual / Justitie sociala / Lesbiene (femei homosexuale / femei gay / dykes) / Lesbiana versus Feminitate / LGBT / Lumea a treia / Mainstream / Marginalizare / Misandrie / Misoginie / Opresiune / Opresiuni intrepatrunse (interlocking/intersecting oppressions) / Patriarhat, / Praxis / Privilegiu / Putere / Queer / Riot Grrrl / Sex / Sexism / Sexualitate / Sex worker / Studii de gen / Tokenism / Violenta sistemica / Transgender / Transsexual / Travestiti / Womanism)

de la ANES
“Violenta de gen”
– definitia problemei si oficial despre legea 217/2003
(o colectie de info privind problemele cu implementarea legii aici)

tot de la ANES, o stire recenta
Raportul “Discriminare multipla in Romania” (de Cristina Mocanu de la Institutul National de Cercetare Stiintifica in Domeniul Muncii si Protectiei Sociale/Laura Grunberg de la AnA SAF) a fost finalizat si lansat

informatii transmise de c.

h. da detalii despre concluziile raportului pe discriminare multipla aici

Five Colleges Women’s Studies Research Center

FELLOWSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

FIVE COLLEGE WOMEN’S STUDIES RESEARCH CENTER
A collaborative project of Amherst, Hampshire, Mount Holyoke, and Smith Colleges and the University of Massachusetts, Amherst

The Center invites applications for its RESEARCH ASSOCIATESHIPS for 2008-2009 from scholars and teachers at all levels of the educational system, as well as from artists, community organizers and political activists, both local and international. Associates are provided with offices in our spacious facility, library privileges, and the collegiality of a diverse community of feminists. Research Associate applications are accepted for either a semester or the academic year. The Center supports projects in all disciplines so long as they focus centrally on women or gender. Regular Research Associateships are non-stipendiary. We accept about 15-18 Research Associates per year.
Continue reading

Call for participation in European female photo exhibition

Tracing love 24/7 engagement
Belgrade, Serbia, June 2008

Exhibition is open for all female photographers.

Send us, please:
• your photos, digital, by e-mail and printed, by mail.
• we need up to 3 photos (in e-mail form, 300 pixels/inch resolution),
• your CV (up to 150 words), and
• your contact (address and phone number).

Photos will be selected by Cultural Centre DEVE, Belgrade, Serbia, and consultants, Ms Marian Bakker and Ms Ditte Wessels from Holland.

Application dead-line is April 1, 2008

All the works that will take part in exhibition will be published in monography Tracing love 24/7 engagement

Our contact:
devebgd@yahoo.com

DEVE
Katiceva 2
11 000 Beograd
Serbia

greenham common – the women’s peace camp

–>YOUR GREENHAM
“…In December it will be 25 years since the 30,000 joined hands around the perimeter fence of a US army base in Newbury in Berkshire in protest at the proposed siting of cruise missiles there. In the years that followed, a permanent protest was established with groups of women camping outside the base. To make their point they repeatedly blocked the gates, penetrated the base, successfully organised mass demonstrations and generally poured joyful scorn on the authorities’ inability to keep them out or shut them up…” (“All our roads led there”, about the documentary)

more @ the f-word:

In 1981 a small group of women and children marched from Cardiff to Greenham Common to protest against the siting of cruise missiles at the U.S military base in Newbury, Berkshire. They were called “Women For Life on Earth” and they triggered the birth of a new non-violent direct action movement and the biggest women-only peace protest the world has ever seen.

Upon arrival at the base some women, in Suffragette style, chained themselves to the main gate. Legend has it that the base commander came out to greet the women and with a sneer informed them that as far as he was concerned, they could stay there as long as they liked. So stay they did, in their thousands, for approximately the next 12 years, long enough to see the last U.S soldier leave by the gates they had built.

In December 1982 30,000 women joined hands around the nine and a half mile perimeter fence at the base and followed this up the year after with an even bigger “Embrace The Base” protest. Women took direct action against the military machine that they saw as a direct threat to themselves and to the poorest women and children of the world. While the military boy’s games went on behind the razer wire, and trillions were being spent on weapons of mass destruction, women protested that so many die without clean water or food or medicine, that hospitals and schools were underfunded, that women’s refuges had to run on charity and mourned the many killed in war. It was clear to this re-emerging new Women’s Peace Movement that peace was a feminist issue, and while men were making decisions at that base every day that affected the lives of women and children around the world, women decided to take some power back, and were making their own decisions and taking their own actions, to stop the warmongers in their tracks.

Greenham Common has now been restored as a common. The local council is taking down the fence and reintroducing native trees, protecting and encouraging wildlife. The silos still stand, as an indication of what used to go on there, the huge bomb proof bunkers for soldiers on 24hr watch, practicing the launch of their nuclear weapons. Now nettles and birch trees are cracking the concrete and forcing their way up through the runway. As the common is reclaimed at last, new protests have been growing for many years at other military bases around Britain.

Greenham touched so many women, not just those who went there, but so many around the world who heard about it on the news, read about it in papers and magazines. Women from Greenham carried that spirit with them, to their local towns and cities, to their local bases. Some of those women turned their attention to Menwith Hill, the largest American military spy base in the world, in the middle of the North Yorkshire dales, seven miles from Harrogate. A permanent women’s peace camp was established there in 1993, and remained there, through various evictions, for the next five years.

and from protester rebecca johnson in a 1987 letter-to-the-editor:

I lived at Greenham for five years, from August 1982. When I first arrived there was only one gate, the Main Gate, with about 15 women living in the shadow of imminent eviction. Sure enough, the caravans were taken away, boulders were dumped near the entrance to restrict access, and it rained for 40 days.

Yet that small band of muddy women managed to organise one of the largest women’s demonstrations this century. Embrace The Base/Close The Base took place on a December weekend in 1982 with 35,000 women encircling the Greenham airfield.

In the five years since then, thousands of women have taken non-violent direct action – trespassing, blockading, painting, and cutting the perimeter fence. They have clogged the courts and prisons. There has been a High Court injunction and daily evictions. It has been an extraordinary saga. By 1983, eight camps had been established around the base (and one inside), and even today there are four surviving camps.

When I first went to Greenham, it was the ‘first use’ war-fighting strategy for the cruise missiles that had shocked me into action. But the women at the camp also raised challenges and discussisons on the many other faces of violence.

From the experience of Greenham, women’s networks arose to campaign against the military exploitation and destruction of the Pacific islands, and against the obscene waste of the food ‘mountains’ Greenham women painted porn shops and the offices of Barclays Bank and Shell, to draw attention to commercial collaboration in the violence of rape and apartheid.

Women from Greenham went out to Zimbabwe and Nicaragua, to the US and the Soviet Union, and linked up with other women struggling for peace and justice around the world and challenging militarism and violence wherever it manifests itself. Greenham women have been part of peace camps in Ireland and took part in Mines Not Missiles marches during the 1984 strike against pit closures.

We tried to establish ways of working that were feminist and non-hierarchical, non-violent, anti-racist and community-oriented. We sought to involve women who could not necessarily live fulltime at the camp, but whose experiece and participation was necessary and valuable to the struggle…

Take Back the Tech 2007

masthead_whole.gif

What’s the issue

//Hundreds of women made private public by testifying about street sexual harrassment in the Blank Noise Project Blogathon in India.
In 2004, a multi-media messanging (MMS) clip of two teenage students engaged in a private sexual act was circulated and eventually put on sale by a third-party in a popular auction site.

//US: In New Mexico, the Domestic Violence Virtual Trial helps judges and court staff learn about issues and challenges in VAW cases, and compare rulings with colleagues.
In 2001, a man was charged with murdering his wife after he intercepted her email and learnt that she planned to leave him. Survivors of domestic violence search for support online and use untraceable, donated cell phones to ensure secure communication.
Best-selling video game, “Grand Theft Auto:San Andreas” encourages their millions of players to treat female sex workers as objects of aggression and murder.

//In South Africa, women survivors of violence gain skills in digital storytelling to share their experiences and courage.

//In Uganda, a SMS campaign called Speak out! Stand Out! is organised by WOUGNET to collect messages against VAW.

//In Quebec, feminists and communication rights activists are creating short video clips and comic postcards on VAW.

//In Malaysia, Burmese refugees are creating audiocasts on issues related to VAW and women’s rights together with Centre for Independent Journalism.

//Take Back the Tech UK: women’s organisations working to end violence against women tell their stories about using ICTs in their work.

tbtt_masthead.gif

Take Back the Tech Global
Continue reading

Bataia e rupta din rai?

de Doina

Spuneam zilele trecute ca violenta culturala determina prejudecati. “Unde loveste parintele creste carne. Femeia trebuie batuta, daca tu nu stii de ce, stie ea. Bataia e rupta din rai.” Sunt numai cateva exemple de exprimari ale “culturii populare “ romanesti. Grav este ca aceasta “cultura populara” violenta legitimeaza si perpetueaza niste comportamente, reactii si moduri de viata. Legitimeaza si perpetueaza violenta impotriva femeii si a copilului.

Hai sa presupunem ca aveti un copil. Are cinci ani si a disparut din fata blocului. E intuneric de doua ore, si ati alarmat vecinii, rudele, politia, salvarea si pompierii.
Si il gasiti, sau apare singur… intr-un tarziu. Rudele alarmate se intorc pe la casele lor. Sunteti, stresati, obositi, nervosi si vreti sa nu se mai intample asa ceva. Si incepeti sa va loviti copilul strigand: Sa nu mai faci asta! Niciodata! Ma auzi? Niciodata! Nu e voie. Ne-ai speriat pe toti. Nu. Mai. Face. Asta. Ai inteles?

Apoi va linistiti, dar vreti sa fiti sigur ca nu se mai intampla si – didactic – incercati sa recapitulati problema cu copilul si sa trageti o concluzie. “Bun, si acuma spune-mi, de ce te-am batut?” Si el isi ridica spre dumneavoastra ochisorii inca inlacrimati si va raspunde: “Pentru ca esti mai mare si mai tare decat mine”.
Continue reading

“Stai pe ganduri? Nu, pe tocuri!”

de Doina

De vreo doua luni ma gandesc ca as avea ceva de spus in legatura cu violenta culturala. Este un concept destul de greu de explicat, cu toate ca suferim cu totii consecintele lui.

Specialistii spun ca fiecare cultura are propriile reguli si norme referitoare la comportamentele, atitudinile si credintele considerate ca fiind potrivite, diferentiind si etichetand nu persoane, ci categorii sociale. Cultura se manifesta prin prejudecatile pe care le avem – fata de femei si barbati, fata de romi, musulmani, atei, copii si soacre. Lucrurile pe care le facem intr-un anume fel pentru ca asa ni s-a transmis prin educatie, prin modelul social, prin faptul ca «toata lumea face/spune la fel». Si e mai simplu sa inghiti pe nemestecate o idee colectiva decat sa te apuci sa o diseci. Mda! Suna destul de complicat.

Dar hai s-o luam altfel! Daca v-as spune ca titlul – citat dintr-o reclama – constituie o forma de violenta culturala m-ati crede? O sa-mi spuneti ca n-ati simtit aceste efecte. O! Ba da! Aceasta fraza traseaza un profil feminin. Creeaza o imagine despre modelul femeii in subconstientul colectiv. In ciuda aparentei unei dulci ironii, pe care o poti privi amuzata, pentru ca esti convinsa ca nu te priveste, mesajul este: “femeile stau pe tocuri, deci nu gandesc”.

O sa ma intrebati, si ce pot face eu impotriva acestei violente? Sunt prea mic, prea singur, prea putin important ca sa pot face ceva in privinta asta. Si acesta este un stereotip cultural. Vi s-a inoculat ideea ca nu puteti face nimic. Ca nu depinde de dumneavoastra, si atunci n-are rost sa va implicati.

In ceea ce priveste reclama, nu stiu ce veti face voi. Eu voi ataca firma care transmite un mesaj nepotrivit, acolo unde pe cei cu putere de decizie ii doare: la buzunar. Prin urmare nu voi mai cumpara in vecii vecilor un produs de la o firma care imi spune ca nu gandesc pentru ca sunt ocupata cu statul pe tocuri, deci sunt femeie, recte proasta. Nici sampon si nici vreun alt produs.

Asta pentru simplul motiv ca sunt o persoana pasnica, adepta a metodelor non-violente de rezolvare a conflictelor.

Desi, dac-ar fi sa ma gandesc bine….

[“Dragoste fara griji”]

Dorinta mea de a pune in discutie violenta culturala nu a pornit de la o reclama. Reclama a fost doar catalizatorul.

Totul a inceput de la o statistica efectuata de un ONG care ajunsese la concluzia ca suntem pe primul loc in Uniunea Europeana… la avorturi. Continue reading